bresslawcom.gif (1009 bytes)

 

FLORIDA DECISION HOLDS THAT A PATIENT IS NOT DUTIBOUND TO ARBITRATE WHEN NOT A SIGNATORY

Click here to save article in WinZip.exe format to your PC 

An appellate court in Florida reversed a lower court’s holding that a patient in a nursing home was bound to arbitrate even though the patient was not a signatory to the contract. 

In Florida, a patient cannot be compelled to arbitrate a dispute unless the patient either signed the agreement or was more than an incidental beneficiary of the contract sought to be arbitrated.  

There were two contracts.  One was a consulting contract and the other was a management contract.  The contracts dealt with the management of the nursing home. Indirectly a well managed nursing home would inure to the benefit of the patients. 

But the benefit must be more than incidental or consequential.  It must be primarily shown to be for the benefit of the person.  The contract must be clear that it is intended to benefit the person against whom arbitration is sought. 

Case No. 2D04-2623, Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District, Opinion filed on February 9, 2005

to top of page